Results 31 to 34 of 34
Thread: Artists' Must
February 13th, 2012 06:05 am #31
February 13th, 2012 02:23 pm #32
if that's the case... what I want to know is... what is it they have that I don't, or we don't? How come their art work is famous and ours aren't? Are we not wording our works correctly? Are we not trolling enough? Or is it because they have an art education background? You know what... I come to realize that art education plays a big roll when it comes to fine art.
I Believe Truth Loves to Lie.
February 14th, 2012 12:01 am #33
A part of fame through things like found art and conceptual art is frankly that they did it first, but more so that they did it first with the best and most thoroughly flushed concept.
And I find that an art history background is really important to creating 'fine art.' It's the knowledge of art pieces from a historical and contemporary setting, one's ability to conceptualize and theorize and also analyze art that is the bridge between art based in kitsch and something of more value in all those historical, conceptual, and fiscal senses. Take concept designers as an example, artists who are generally looked over. There are blogs and forums of people out there filled with hundreds of people who do great digital and traditional art that is glossy and soft focused of sci-fi and fantasy, but none of them really stand out from one another beyond the technical. A great example of someone who does stand out however is Yoshitaka Amano, who does what all those other concept designers do, but he stands out from his cultural and historical references that is obviously drawn from his strong art history knowledge.blah blah blar
February 17th, 2012 12:55 am #34
Nevermind...argued with myself until I decided you were pretty much right, RD.
Last edited by HopelessComposer; February 17th, 2012 at 01:05 am.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)